THE FEMINIST SABOTAGE OF BIRTH OF A NATION by Lisa Davis
FIRST
OF ALL, NATE PARKER DID NOT RAPE THAT WOMAN! It was acknowledged in
court documents by both sides, that she had consensual sex with Nate
AFTER she claimed the assault happened! Although I am always
apprehensive about accepting the mainstream media's definitions about
what is considered a flop at the box office, I completely agree with the
author about the role that those who called themselves "feminists,"
especially Black feminists, played in completely trying to destroy Nate Parker and his chances of having any success with this film.
They immediately began to perpetuate some of the worsts stereotypes
about Black men, such as "A BLACK MAN CAN'T EVER BE NOT GUILTY!" And
the first mistake that was made was that they didn't even attempt to get
all the facts of the case before speaking out against it! How the hell
do you write about a case that has already happened? There is
something called Transcripts and before recklessly writing about a court
case they should of gotten off gotten off their asses and dug through
those transcripts! And the first place they should have started with is
the summations of the prosecutor and the defense! That will usually
lay out much of the arguments and evidence that came out in court. In
the prosecutor's closing arguments he acknowledged that the woman had
consensual sex with Nate hours after she claimed the rape happened. So
this girl claimed to have some memory of being "raped" by two Black men,
but yet the first thing that she does after that is wakes up in the
morning and decides to have consensual sex with Nate!
Black
feminists simply immediately allowed their politics to be defined by
what happens when white women accuse white men of rape. But the
complete reverse is true when white women accuse Black men of rape! A
Black man doesn't even ever have to have seen her in order to be
convicted of raping her! That happened all the time! How the hell is
that not part of the rape culture narrative? How does anyone calling
themselves themselves a Black feminist ignore that? You don't need any
kind of evidence to convict a Black person of anything -- least of all a
Black man. Now I'm not saying that a Black man can't be guilty of
raping a white woman, but what one should always do before accusing
anyone of anything, is to try to get the facts of the case, and that
means gathering information from both sides. And when you are judging
the merits of any court cases, get the effing court transcripts and comb
through them! If you call yourselves a journalist, you have an
effing responsibility to do that!
And another conversation
about rape culture that needs to be talked about is what happens when a
Black woman accuses a white man of raping her? Hundreds of years of
repeatedly raping Black women with absolute legal impunity throughout
enslavement and Jim Crow. And I don’t think much has changed. Just
study Tawana Brawley!
